Anthropometric Measurement
Accurate nutritional anthropometric measurement is a contested domain. This paper begins by comparing and contrasting the three most common types of anthropometric methods used in NHS hospitals (Hamwi method, Body Mass Index and waist measurement). It then explores the need to adjust measurements for different social groups. Finally, it identifies the factors that contribute to fluctuations in weight.
There are no universally accepted guidelines for amounts and types of food to be taken. The World Health Organization (WHO) for example, recommends eating a wide variety of foods, cutting down on salt and sugar and increasing intake of vegetables and fruit to maintain a correct body weight (World Health Organisation, 2010). The definition of correct body weight is culturally sensitive as Dudek (2010) argues that different cultures have different tolerances for bodyweight. However, universal measurements have shown that excess body weight can accelerate type 2 diabetes, stroke, arthritis, breathing problems, and psychological disorders such as clinical depression (Laquatra, 1990).
The Hamwi method calculates calorie needs in order to prevent obesity in adults with diabetes (Hamwi, 1967). This method is sensitive to different ways fat is deposited between genders. For women, 100 pounds is allowed for the first 5ft of height and then 5 pounds are added for each additional inch. Men have a baseline of 106 pounds for the first 5ft height and then 6 pounds are added for each additional inch. Actual weight is compared with this ideal benchmark (Hamwi, 1967). The advantage of Hamwi’s method is that, it is easy to use, optimum body weight can be calculated by without the need for spreadsheet programs. The measurement requires only gender and height (Harvey, 2006). The disadvantage of the Hamwi method is that Dr Hamwi provides no references or explanations on the scientific methodology for his formula (Hamwi, 1967). It is based purely on his experiences and the assumption that, in general, males are larger than females and is therefore inaccurate.
Body Mass Index (BMI) is based on body composition and is the international standard used by the WHO for obesity measurement (rganisation Expert Committee, 1995). The BMI is more scientifically sound than the Hamwi method as BMI measurements are based on data that has been collected and published for males and females of all ages, social, economic and ethnic groups (Lustig, 2003). BMI is based on the notion that weight can affect illness and eventually mortality (Harvey, 2006). However, BMI should be treated with caution as Greenberg claims that a one-time measurement of BMI is not an accurate measurement of potential mortality, rather average BMI measurements should be taken throughout adulthood to gain a vision of weight fluctuation between ages. Jeffreys (2003) further emphasises that overweight BMI in early adulthood (median age, 22) is ‘predictive of all-cause mortality’, but gaining weight, in mid-adulthood (median age, 38), is less strongly associated with mortality (Greenberg, 2001). Therefore being overweight over a longer period of time has stronger implications for cardiac arrest than being overweight at a certain point in a person’s life. Both Greenberg (2001) and Jeffreys (2003) suggest that having an obese BMI score later in life is not associated with higher death rates. This calls for different BMI measurements to be made available for different age groups. In practice different BMI scales are made available for children but not for adult or geriatric groups.
Lohman (1991) argues that waist measurement is a better measurement for monitoring nutrition than BMI. In his studies he found that the risk of death for women over the age of fifty was highest for those with normal BMI, but waistlines over the 35cm. Lohman (1991) believes that large waist measurement is an indication of potential mortality in older persons but overweight/obese BMI measurements are not necessarily a risk to the patient. He proposes this theory based on the fact that waist measurements reflect the fat that accumulates around ‘the vital organs at an older age, this in turn can lead to cardiac arrest. Lohman (1991), however, does not further break down the classification of geriatric age groups, as Kozier (1998) argues ideal weight for old people varies between 51+, 70+ and 95+. The US Department of Health and Human Services states that waist parameters should be carried out in conjunction with BMI (The US Department of Health and Human Services, 2008). My experience of working in an eating disorder unit is that both measurements are taken, however in GP surgeries I have only witnessed the use of BMI. Therefore I have not witnessed evidence of a consistent approach across the NHS on anthropometric measurement.
Frisancho (1990) believes that anthropometric measurement should not only be composed according to age, but according to ethnicity. He explores the difference in anthropometric measurement of those living in the United States from Caucasian ethnicity, African ethnicity and South East Asian ethnicity in order to generate specific measurements. Kozier (1998) suggests that anthropometric data for cultural groups should be correlated according to universal mortality rates as opposed to weight norms within that culture because certain cultures diets are healthier than others.
The nurse should try to understand reasons for fluctuations in weight. These changes may be caused by medical, social and psychological factors. Medical factors that could affect appetite are a change in medication altering the ability to taste (Bottomley, 2008). This will need to be highlighted to the doctor to advise on a potential change of medication. The patient may be experiencing physical pain and thus pain killers administered prior to meal times may aid the patient to eat (Casey, 1998). Additionally, it may be necessary for the speech and language therapist to carry out an assessment to diagnose swallowing problems, in order to determine whether dietary aids such as thickeners and feeding spoons could be beneficial (Norton, 2008). A physiotherapist may also be needed to aid with any postural problems affecting eating (Paquette, 2005).
Psychological factors that could be contributing to a lack of eating may be clinical depression or a fear of eating due to past trauma or body image issues, or a general restlessness (Bottomley, 2008). Psychological issues will need to be treated by the nurse through gentle persuasion and behaviour modification techniques (Whitman, 1975) as well as potential referral for counselling. Using empathy and social skills is preferable to the alternative of parenteral feeding (Rosdahl, 2003).
Further social factors that may be affecting the patient’s eating habits are a partiality for certain portion sizes and preferences on presentation of food (Harvey, 2002). Not enjoying eating in front of others, unclean continence aids, not having a clean bed table and a generally dirty environment can further affect the desire to eat (Harvey, 2002).
In conclusion, accurate nutritional anthropometric measurement is a contested domain. The Hamwi method, Body Mass Index and waist measurement have advantages and disadvantages and there is debate surrounding the evidence behind the utilisation of these methods. Furthermore, it is a contested subject as to whether specific guidelines should be sought to accommodate age ranges and ethnicity as well as the extent to which these guidelines should be sensitive to age, sex and cultural background. Finally, nurses should not rely solely on anthropometric measurements as a guide to patient nutrition. It is the nurse’s duty to observe if a patient is not eating meals and to make every effort to address their concerns.
Bibliography
Bottomley A, Mckeown J. (2008) Promoting nutrition for people with mental health problems. Nursing Standard., 22(49), pp. 48-55.
Byles J, Alemeida O. (2010). Body Mass Index and Survival in Men and Women Aged 70 to 75. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(2), pp. 234-241.
Campillo B, Paillaud E, Uzan I, Merlier I, Abedellaoui M, Perennec J. (2004) Value of body mass index in the detection of severe malnutrition: influence of the pathology and changes in anthropometric parameters. Clinical Nutrition, 23, pp. 551-559.
Casey G. (1998) The importance of nutrition in wound healing. Nursing Standard., 13(3), pp. 51-56.
Coxall K. (2007) Applying the key principles of nutrition to nursing practice, Nursing Standard., 22(36), pp. 44-48.
Dudek S.G. (2010) Nutrition essentials for nursing practice. 6th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health.
Frisancho A.R. (1990) Anthropometric standards for the assessment of growth and nutritional status. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Greenberg J. (2001) Biases in the mortality risk versus body mass index relationship in the NHANES-1 Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. International Journal of Obesity, 25(7), pp. 1071-1078.
Hamwi G. (1967) Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis and Treatment. vol.II ed. California: ADA.
Harvey K.S. (2006) Methods for Determining Healthy Body Weight in End Stage Renal Disease. Journal of Renal Nutrition, 16(3), pp. 269-276.
Harvey T, Troop NA, Treasure JL, Murphy T. (2002) Fear, disgust, and abnormal eating attitudes: a preliminary study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32(2), pp. 213-218.
Jeffreys M, Mccarron P, Gunnell D, McEwen J, Davey Smith G.(2003) Body mass index in eary and mid-adulthood and subsequent mortality: a historical cohort study. International Journal of Obesity, 27, pp. 1391-1397.
Kozier B, Cagle CB. (1998) Fundamentals of nursing : concepts, process, and practice. Updat 5th ed. Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.
Laquatra I, Gerlach MJ. (1990). Nutrition in clinical nursing. Albany ; London: Delmar.
Lohman TG, Martorell R, Roche AF. (1991) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Abridg edn. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics.
Lustig JR, Strauss B. (2003) NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT | Anthropometry and Clinical Examination. In: BENJAMIN CABALLERO, ed, Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 4181-4184.
Norton C. (2008) Oxford handbook of gastrointestinal nursing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paquette M. (2005) Perceptions of healthy eating: state of knowledge and research gaps. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96, pp. S15-9.
Randle J, Coffey F, and Bradbury M.(2009) Oxford handbook of clinical skills in adult nursing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosdahl CB., Kowalski MT (2003) Textbook of basic nursing. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.; London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Siviter B. (2008) The student nurse handbook ; a survival guide. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall Elsevier.
Whitman HH, Shelby J, Lukes K. (1975) Behaviour Modification for Terminally Ill Patients. The American Journal of Nursing, 75(1), pp. pp. 98-101.
Internet Sources
The British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, [On line] Available at: [accessed 16 March 2011]
The US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health & National Institute of Diabetes and Digestion and Kidney Diseases (2008) Weight and Waist Measurement: Tools for Adults [On line] Available at: [accessed 16 March 2011]
World Health Organisation and Department of Health Republic South Africa (2010) The 3 Fives: healthy choices, healthy life [On line] Available at:www.who.int/foodsafety/consumer/en [accessed 01 April 2011]
World Health Organisation Expert Committee (1995) Physical Status: The use and interpretation of Anthropometry [On line] Available at: [accessed 01 April 2011]
![order now](https://nursinghomeworkhelps.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/order-now.jpg)